<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ThruIT &#187; password</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thruit.com/tag/password/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thruit.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Invading Privacy Our Only Defense?</title>
		<link>http://thruit.com/2008/12/is-invading-privacy-our-only-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://thruit.com/2008/12/is-invading-privacy-our-only-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will Kievit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[password]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex offender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webdotlife.wordpress.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="size-full wp-image-149 alignleft" title="Hand on mouse" src="http://thruit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/parents-blasé-over-online-sex-offender-risk-7042000300.jpg" alt="Hand on mouse" width="180" height="180" />Different arguments have been made in the past for the treatment of ex-convicts and their privacy. Various laws have been implemented that violates their privacy (for example <a title="Meghan's Law" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan's_Law" target="_blank">Meghan's Law</a>) and this article is not setting out to argue whether they are right or wrong. However, a new law that is starting tomorrow in Georgia seems to be a little bit too extreme.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-149 alignleft" title="Hand on mouse" src="http://thruit.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/parents-blasé-over-online-sex-offender-risk-7042000300.jpg" alt="Hand on mouse" width="180" height="180" />Different arguments have been made in the past for the treatment of ex-convicts and their privacy. Various laws have been implemented that violates their privacy (for example <a title="Meghan's Law" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan's_Law" target="_blank">Meghan&#8217;s Law</a>) and this article is not setting out to argue whether they are right or wrong. However, a new law that is starting tomorrow in Georgia seems to be a little bit too extreme.</p>
<p>Many states now require sex offenders to turn in their email addresses and screen names so that the government can keep track of them. However, this new Georgia law requires that all sex offenders also hand over their passwords. Sara Totonchi of the Atlanta-based Southern Center for Human Rights stated that &#8220;This essentially will give law enforcement the ability to read e-mails between family members, between employers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many would argue that because the offender committed the act that he must forever pay the price. But the question that arises in my mind is&#8230; How far is too far?&#8230; What if the government started requiring them to have live video feeds in their houses that the government could watch?</p>
<p>Check out the article: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28437829/">Sex offenders must hand over passwords &#8211; Crime &amp; courts- msnbc.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thruit.com/2008/12/is-invading-privacy-our-only-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
